Latest Update: Keystone XL Back on Obama's Desk

News — the tar sands action team December 23, 2011 at 12:30 pm
Dear Friends, We’ve been doing our best the last couple of weeks to keep you up-to-date on the machinations about Keystone in Washington. “Our best” in this case has only been so-so, because the whole process has been incredibly confusing. But it seems to be getting a little clearer now. Today the House agreed to legislation for a payroll tax cut that also includes language forcing the president to decide one way or the other on the Keystone pipeline in the next 60 days. Our hope is that the president will use the opportunity to deny the permit, and sooner rather than later.  His administration has made it clear many times over the past few weeks that the demand for quick approval attached to this legislation would result in the rejection of the pipeline. As White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer tweeted a few days ago: the bill “simply shortens  the review process in a way that virtually guarantees that the pipeline will NOT be approved.” No one could responsibly approve such a project under the gun; even the Canadian government announced this month that they would delay the review of proposed  pipelines to the Pacific for a year because of environmental concerns. You have patiently and firmly explained to the president for the last six months why this pipeline is a bad idea—and by “you” I mean the twenty top scientists who sent  a letter explaining the climate impacts, the ten Nobel Peace Prize laureates, the dozens of tribal leaders who signed the Mother Earth Accord, the 1253 people who got arrested, the 12,000 who circled the White House, the 500,000 who filed public comments on the plan, the many many more who sent letters and emails and made phone calls to the White House and Congress. You’ve done an amazing job; we’ll know before long whether we need you to make one more grand push, and as soon as we know you’ll know. In the meantime, please enjoy the holidays. We’re getting our first small snowfall of the season in Vermont, which I’m taking as a good omen. So many thanks, Bill McKibben for 350.org
  1. Anonymous says:

    Bill: The CEO of a company where I worked a long time would say “If you want an answer now, the answer is ‘no’.” Simple: Now? No! Barack, being the ultimate CEO can say ‘no’ now too. In the mean time, let’s all be sure to keep the lines of communication open and http://bit.ly/TellBarack .. http://bit.ly/SomethingDaily .. like YES BARACK YOU CAN SAY NO TO TAR SANDS OIL

    Happy Holidays, Bill et al

    Doug350 (#43 on Day 6)

  2. Patti Rich says:

    as a research scientist for ther state of california ..i say mr president ..you can say NO to big oil ..you can say YES to SOLAR, WIND, HYDRO & BIO-FUELS,

  3. Thanks for putting Obama in a box tar sand!
    If Obama opposes the pipe line he loses the unions and the gop mantra that he is AGAINST jobs!
    If he for the pipe line,he risk the enviornmentalist,( who will probably vote for Romney anyway) —storming the white house and making things very difficult for him! That is why he wanted to wait till after the 2012 election!
    You guys should have protested and EXPOSED the gop at their offices!
    Thanks for NOTHING!
    I

You must be logged in to post a comment.


(c) 2014 Tar Sands Action | powered by WordPress